• Log in
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact us
Telecoms IT News - VanillaPlus
  • Home
  • News
  • Verticals
    • 4G
    • 5G News
    • Big data analytics
    • Bill & Charge
    • CEM
    • Companies
    • Digital transformation
    • Fraud prevention
    • Managed services
    • Network optimisation
    • NFV Hub
    • OSS
    • People
    • Policy
    • Revenue assurance
    • Revenue management
    • Service assurance
    • Service Provisioning
    • Test & measurement
  • Digital Edition
  • Events
    • Events diary
    • Webinars
  • Videos
  • VP Featured
    • Webinars
    • Podcast
    • Editorial advisory board
    • Expert opinions
    • Hot List
    • Operator View
    • Press releases
    • Reports & whitepapers
    • Special reports
    • Talking Heads
    • Troubleticket
    • Digital Talking Heads
  • Directory
  • Trending Tech
  • Subscribe
 

You are here:

  • Home
  • News
  • Most tech-savvy consumers believe that they are more ‘multi-channel’ than the companies that serve them

Most tech-savvy consumers believe that they are more ‘multi-channel’ than the companies that serve them

26 May, 2016 at 9:00 PM

Most tech-savvy consumers believe that they are more ‘multi-channel’ than the companies that serve them
Tony Porter, head of Global Communications
at Eckoh

A significant number of increasingly tech-savvy consumers feel aggrieved at the difficulty they face getting service from businesses, despite their commitment to multi-channel strategies aimed at easing the waiting times for customers.

A poll of UK consumers for customer service technology expert Eckoh found that the majority of customers (73%) recently had to repeat details of their complaint in separate interactions during the resolution process despite businesses claiming that they offer a ‘multi-channel’ or ‘omni-channel’ service that improves service.

Tony Porter, head of global communications, Eckoh, who commissioned the report, said: “In too many cases, shoppers find that their service providers are implementing ‘multi-flannel’ strategies, better at hindering communication than improving it.”

Respondents cited heavy waiting times on phone calls; complex telephone menus; ‘Catch-22 menus’ that don’t take account of the callers’ requirements and eventually disconnect the call; and companies that fail to feature phone numbers on their ‘contact us’ page.

Asked to rate channels of communication, 47% of respondents said that they found the phone most annoying. One in ten respondents said that they had waited for approaching half an hour on their most recent call for help and a third of respondents said that they had had to wait for between 10 and 15 minutes.

Despite this, 32% of respondents said that they found the phone the most useful way of communicating with a service provider, outstripping all other methods and demonstrating that when well executed, phone-based services are the method of choice for consumers. The majority of respondents routinely use more than four personal communication channels, from a list that includes Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, WhatsApp and texts.

Email was cited by 32% as the most frustrating method of communication. Websites (16%) and online chat services (5%) fared relatively well.

Online chat was rated the best and most convenient method of contact by 26% of respondents. Twitter was identified by 21% of respondents, email by 16% and websites by 5%.

Asked to identify the types of companies that were most difficult to connect with, respondents ranked the following as the five worst industry sectors:

  1. Mobile operators
  2. Utilities
  3. Broadband providers
  4. Pay TV firms
  5. Retailers

“Companies without a coherent customer service infrastructure are, in the eyes of the customers, at best falling short of expectations, and at worst are seen as deliberately obstructive,” Tony Porter added.

He said: “It’s vital that companies execute better when it comes to multi- and omni-channel. There are customer retention risks and serious problems with the validity of customer data if businesses don’t do a better job at uniting the various contact streams. Multi-channel shouldn’t mean parallel lines. It means shared intelligence and converged service.”

The purpose of these new approaches to customer service is to improve efficiency and provide faster resolution of customer queries, enabling customers to mix and match channels for convenience. However, a surprisingly high number of companies run their channels almost entirely independently, which means that customers may find themselves duplicating effort without improving the prospects of a speedy resolution.

Customer frustration is mainly connected to wasted time and repetition. One respondent said: “It appals me that I have to repeat even a straightforward query each time I call or email or use the website. Nothing joins up, despite claims about ease and convenience. I find that I have to share my details again and again. I’m worried that businesses are being pretty cavalier with my personal data.”

Tony Porter said: “There are many companies that do an outstanding job of integrating their communication with customers. Communications have transformed in the last decade – and staying ahead of the curve requires commitment, expertise and resource.

On the flip side, there are many companies that still have customers who are probably better at joined up multi-channel communication. Our polling shows that the average UK consumer now uses around seven different electronic communication channels, many of them consolidated in one mobile device. Customers are adept at organising data across multiple channels, and their expectations are correspondingly high.”

Comment on this article below or via Twitter: @ VanillaPlus OR @jcvplus


category: News

Tags: communication, Facebook, Instagram, mobile device, multi-channel, omni-channel, Snapchat, Tony Porter, Twitter, WhatsApp

VanillaPlus Q4 Magazine
 

VanillaPlus Issue 4 2022: CSP focus turns to generating revenue from enterprises

As 5G arrives, private networks start to gather momentum and new applications enabled by artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning and software-based network control transform telecoms. VanillaPlus caught up with Sam Barker, the head of analytics and forecasting at Juniper Research, to understand where the opportunities lie for communications service providers (CSPs).

READ NOW

Comments are closed.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
  • Subscribe
Relax time
Read the new novel by J.J. Cowan on Africa’s conflict minerals trade and forced labour. 5* Reviews on Amazon.co.uk Paperback & Kindle

Check out on Amazon

X

Be the first to know!

  • The top telecom IT news stories of the minute
    in your inbox
  • Exclusive offers for entry into hundreds of
    events worldwide
  • Free access to a huge selection of the latest
    analyst reports and whitepapers
Subscribe now so you don't miss out
Don’t show me this again
Please check your email
x
Vanillaplus - The Global Voice of Telecoms IT
The Global Voice of Telecoms IT

VanillaPlus is the world-leading resource covering digital transformation for the communications industry. VanillaPlus brings you exclusive News, Expert Views, and Event Reviews. See Interviews from CEOs, CTOs, and COOs who are successfully transforming their business today.

Connect

Facebook Twitter YouTube LinkedIn

NEWS

  • Latest Telecoms IT news

DIGITAL EDITION

  • Latest Editions

OTHER

  • Newsletters [Archive]

KNOWLEDGE CENTRE

  • Webinars
  • Special Reports
  • Talking Heads
  • Editorial Advisory Board

COMPANY

  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

PARTNERS

  • IoT News

© 2014-2022 VanillaPlus - The global voice for telecoms IT. All rights reserved.